iOS, Android and cross-platform applications delivered continuously despite a third party sitting between your merge and your users — staged rollouts, feature flags, release trains and a native-versus-cross-platform decision made on economics.
Mobile is the one place where someone else owns your release path. Teams that treat store review as an immovable wall end up with monthly batches and mobile as the slowest thing they own. Teams that engineer around it ship weekly and decouple release from reveal.
What we build
Swift and Kotlin applications where platform fidelity, performance or deep OS integration justify two codebases — and where that justification is stated rather than assumed.
React Native and Flutter where the shared surface genuinely dominates, with a clear-eyed account of what still has to be written twice and what the bridge costs you.
Feature flags and remote config so that shipping a binary and revealing a feature are separate decisions; phased rollouts with automated halt criteria; a release train that runs whether or not every feature is ready.
Crash-free session rate, ANR and startup-time budgets, per-version adoption curves and a forced-upgrade path — because on mobile your old versions keep running in the field for months whether you like it or not.
API shaping for constrained networks, offline-first data models, conflict resolution and sync — the parts that determine whether the app is usable on a patchy connection or only in the office.
The hard parts
A vendor who cannot tell you where their own discipline is difficult has either not done it or is not going to tell you the truth about your project either.
A bad web deploy is reverted in minutes. A bad mobile release is in users hands until review approves the next one, so the safety mechanism has to be a server-controlled flag rather than a redeploy.
Some users will run a build from a year ago. Every API change is therefore a compatibility negotiation with your own past, and a forced-upgrade mechanism is infrastructure you should build before you need it.
The shared-code proportion is real but consistently overstated, and the residue — platform integrations, performance work, store compliance, native modules — is the expensive part. It is often the right call; it is rarely the cheap one.
Stack
The full stackThis is what we reach for when the decision is ours. When you already have an estate, we work in it — the stack is part of the engagement, not a precondition of it.
Roles we staff
The reasoning, published
Every capability has a matching domain in the knowledge library. Read it before you talk to us — it is the fastest way to tell whether we know what we are doing.
Store review is the one place a third party sits between your merge and your users. It is a fixed cost in the batch-size equation, not a wall, and the monthly cadence it seems to force is a choice.
Practitioner · 10 minOn mobile you cannot roll back, so flags are not a convenience — they are the safety mechanism that replaces rollback. Remote config architecture, kill switches, default-off discipline, flag debt, and rollout halts that fire without a human.
Practitioner · 10 minWhat to instrument on a client you cannot attach a debugger to, which signals deserve an automated rollout halt, and how to tell a real regression from noise when early updaters skew every number.
Practitioner · 10 minThe shared-code decision is an economic one, not a technical preference. What genuinely shares, what never does, the residue that eats the savings, and how to make the decision once so it is not relitigated every quarter.
Advanced · 10 minEvery binary you have shipped is still running somewhere. Version fragmentation is a permanent condition, not a transitional one — and every API change becomes a compatibility negotiation with your own past.
Practitioner · 10 minHow to buy it
Capability answers who works on it. The engagement model answers what we are accountable for, how it is priced and how it ends.
Other capabilities
Probabilistic systems
LLM applications, retrieval systems, agents and applied ML built to a standard you can put in front of a regulator — with evaluation harnesses, cost controls and failure behaviour designed in rather than discovered in production.
Software that acts
Systems that choose their own next step — tool-using agents, orchestrated workflows and automation that spans your existing systems — designed so that what they are permitted to do, and what happens when they are wrong, are decided up front.
Irreversible deployment
Protocol and application development where a deployment cannot be rolled back and a defect is a withdrawal. Contract engineering, security review, upgradeability design and the on-chain boundary decision.
The paved road
The substrate the other three stand on: cloud infrastructure, deployment pipelines, observability, data platforms and the internal paved road that determines how fast every team above it can move.